<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Language on Samurai of Kaizen</title><link>https://qa.jasutin.site/tags/language/</link><description>Recent content in Language on Samurai of Kaizen</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:12:23 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://qa.jasutin.site/tags/language/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Philosophizing with ChatGPT</title><link>https://qa.jasutin.site/logbook/philosophizing-with-chatgpt/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:12:23 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://qa.jasutin.site/logbook/philosophizing-with-chatgpt/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Borrowed language.&lt;br&gt;
Borrowed light.&lt;br&gt;
Still a mirror.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I talk with language models to see where they hold shape under pressure. Not whether they can flatter. Whether they can stay coherent when the subject turns inward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One answer from ChatGPT stayed with me: personality is often just a stable probability field that humans read as character. That is a useful sentence because it cuts through romance without draining the subject of interest.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>